<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MarketerView &#187; Tim Armstrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketerview.com/tag/tim-armstrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketerview.com</link>
	<description>A View From World Of Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No News On AOL &#8211; What Does It Mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.marketerview.com/2009/04/29/no-news-on-aol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketerview.com/2009/04/29/no-news-on-aol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketerview.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg was all over the rumor that Time Warner would announced during today&#8217;s earnings call that it has a spin-off plan in place for AOL.  That didn&#8217;t exactly happen, but it looks like Time Warner is indeed moving closer to an AOL spin-off.  In fact, they&#8217;re buying back Google&#8217;s 5% stake in AOL.
But, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://theregoesdave.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/aol_logo.jpg" class="alignleft" width="100">Bloomberg was all over the rumor that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&#038;sid=amYD8kpIVobk&#038;refer=us">Time Warner would announced during today&#8217;s earnings call</a> that it has a spin-off plan in place for AOL.  That didn&#8217;t exactly happen, but it looks like Time Warner is indeed moving closer to an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/business/media/30warner.html?ref=technology">AOL spin-off.</a>  In fact, they&#8217;re buying back Google&#8217;s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090429-719159.html">5% stake in AOL.</a></p>
<p>But, could a spin-off mean a real challenge to Google, in the form of AOL?  Well, AOL now as Tim Armstrong, Google&#8217;s former head of North American advertising sales and now CEO at AOL.  Clearly, with the timing of his arrival to AOL as CEO, <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/04/armstrongs-small-step-from-google-could-be-a-giant-leap-for-aol.html">Armstrong is motivated.</a>  A spun-off AOL will give Armstrong that much more latitude to clean house and do things his way; presumably, the Google way.  </p>
<p>For its part, AOL earnings dropped 23%.  Armstrong had better get his broom ready, because he&#8217;ll likely need it if AOL is become the world-class advertising and content company that it once was. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketerview.com/2009/04/29/no-news-on-aol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
