<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MarketerView &#187; Boston.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketerview.com/tag/boston-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketerview.com</link>
	<description>A View From World Of Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Boston Globe May Hop On Pay-To-Read Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.marketerview.com/2009/08/23/boston-globe-may-hop-on-pay-to-read-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketerview.com/2009/08/23/boston-globe-may-hop-on-pay-to-read-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketerview.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we&#8217;ve previously written, more and more newspapers will soon adopt a new model for online content, whereby their readership will be charged access for some or all sections of their websites.  The Boston Globe is the largest such newspaper to consider such a model (with the obvious exception being the Wall Street Journal, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/globe_logo.bmp" class="alignleft" width="100"  />As we&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.marketerview.com/2009/07/29/newspaper-to-readership-pay-us/">previously written,</a> more and more newspapers will soon adopt a new model for online content, whereby their readership will be charged access for some or all sections of their websites.  The Boston Globe is the largest such newspaper to consider such a model (with the obvious exception being the Wall Street Journal, which has always charged for content), with the announcement that they are considering <a href="http://boston.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass_roundup/2009/08/bostoncom_may_soon_come_at_a_price.html">charging for access to Boston.com</a>.  More from NECN: </p>
<p><embed pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" src="http://www.necn.com/avp31.swf?`or9mv1)csQ,.#*ZL~,(!ZAps6&#038;=J&lt;]gSFmatP|-e(Ddbr1M=T5Z=(JNe[k $WUcV*Of'-iwQVrxLS4D6a{!guWG/,{HhU4uoIm^BhSK`u~aoCH3u=Db(neJCEBoN3s{A)*.xhFG:kyglU|y&lt;vALM})YVHUwat:PqtA@.93g5^vEAT}=@aYb81jS#Y!TeBUdhm*Ul&lt;F,8j25hNM&lt;cii(hX~mEE5.kmg8iIHsEf){|~s-`YB&lt;7~n NYJ~8?39C='!/5:2YOT1KvaoEbE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" width="700" align="center"></embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketerview.com/2009/08/23/boston-globe-may-hop-on-pay-to-read-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
